<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>STE on Warpspace Blog</title><link>https://blog.caveduck.io/tags/ste/</link><description>Recent content in STE on Warpspace Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.154.5</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.caveduck.io/tags/ste/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Efficient ML #5, QAT: Undoing Quantization Error During Training</title><link>https://blog.caveduck.io/posts/quantization-aware-training/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.caveduck.io/posts/quantization-aware-training/</guid><description>PTQ works for big models but collapses on small models and low bits (down to 13.6% at 2-bit). The fix is QAT: folding quantization into training itself. We insert fake quantization into the forward pass and punch through round&amp;rsquo;s zero-gradient problem with the STE (Straight-Through Estimator). If round has zero derivative, how does anything learn? Answered with plots measured directly on an MNIST MLP.</description></item></channel></rss>